68
con
la
base
a
la
medición
de
la
pena
establecida
en
el
art.
65
del
CP.
Finalmente,
se
resalta
que
dos
de
ellas
se
dictaron
en
hechos
punibles
califcados
como
violencia
familiar
como
una
referencia
a
una
política
criminal
judicial,
a
pesar
de
ser
considerado
un
crimen
de
acuerdo
a
la
clasifcación
establecido en el art. 13 del CP
establecido en el art. 13 del CP
establecido en el art. 13 del CP
establecido en el art. 13 del CP
establecido en el art. 13 del CP
establecido en el art. 13 del CP
establecido en el art. 13 del CP.
Palabras clave:
Palabras clave:
Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.
Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.
Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.
Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.
Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.
Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.
Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.
Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.
Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.
Abstract
The
objective
of
this
research
is
to
analyze
the
fnal
sentences
passed
in
an
abbreviated
procedure in terms of the requirement of motivation established by the Paraguayan Code of Criminal
Procedure.
For
this
purpose,
frstly,
it
was
developed
from
the
background,
the
formalities
and
requirements that the parties must comply with, so that the jurisdictional organ prints the formalities
for
the
application
of
the
mentioned
special
procedure,
which
allows
accelerating
the
conclusion
of
a
trial
before
the
same
instance. Therefore,
in
order
to
achieve
this
objective,
a
qualitative
approach
was
chosen,
with
a
non-experimental
documentary
design. As
for
the
data
collection
technique
was
the
documentary
analysis,
consequently,
a
search
and
reading
of
the
literature
on
the
subject
and
fnal judgments of the virtual portal of the Supreme Court of Justice, during the month of December
2022
of
the
courts
of
the
Central
Department,
for
which
sentences
are
imposed
in
this
context,
was
carried
out.
In
terms
of
scope,
it
was
exploratory-descriptive. Among
the
main
fndings
we
have
the
analysis
of
fve
sentences
passed
in
the
framework
of
the
mentioned
procedure,
of
which
three
of
them
lacked
sufcient
motivation
on
the
basis
of
the
measurement
of
the
penalty
established
in Art.
65
of
the
Penal
Code.
Finally,
it
is
highlighted
that
two
of
them
were
dictated
in
punishable
acts
qualifed
as
family
violence
as
a
reference
to
a
judicial
criminal
policy,
despite
being
considered
a
crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.
crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.
crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.
crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.
crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.
crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.
crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.
crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.
crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.
crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.
crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.
crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.
crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.
Key words:
Key words:
Abbreviated procedure, sentence, motivation, penalty measurement, defendant.
Abbreviated procedure, sentence, motivation, penalty measurement, defendant.
Abbreviated procedure, sentence, motivation, penalty measurement, defendant.
Abbreviated procedure, sentence, motivation, penalty measurement, defendant.
Abbreviated procedure, sentence, motivation, penalty measurement, defendant.
Abbreviated procedure, sentence, motivation, penalty measurement, defendant.
Abbreviated procedure, sentence, motivation, penalty measurement, defendant.
Ñemombyky
Ko jeporeka oñeha’ã ohesa’ỹijo umi sentencia definitiva ho’áva procedimiento abreviado-
kuápe
omyesakã
haĝua
umi
mba’e
omopyendáva
ichupe
ojerureháicha
paragupai
Código
Procesal
Penal.
Upevarã,
tenonderãite,
ojeguerojera
iñepyrũmby’ypy,
hekotee
ha
hembijerure
omoañetevaerã
mayma
oñembojovakéva
guive,
ikatu
haĝuáicha
pe
órgano
jurisdiccional
omboguata
pe
procedimiento
especial
jepuru
ryepýpe,
ikatúva
ombohape
juicio
opa
pya’eve
haĝua
upe
instancia-pe.
Upevarã,
oñemoañete
haĝua
ojehupytyséva
oñembosako’i
peteĩ
enfoque
cualitativo,
diseño
documental
no
experimental
hendive.
Pe
Técnica
oipurúva
ombyaty
haĝua
marandúkatu
kuatiañe’ẽ
ñehesa’ỹijo,
upéicha
rupi,
oñembosako’i
peteĩ
jeporeka
ha
oñemoñe’ẽ
opáichagua kuatia ojeguerekóva ko ñe’ẽrã rehe ha umi sentencia definitiva ojejuhúva Corte Suprema
de
Justicia
página-pe,
umi
juzgado
departamento
central
-peguáva
diciembre
2022
pegua
pukukue
javeve,
umi
kuatia
ojehaiha
pegua
condena.
Upe
ijepysokue
katu
héra
exploratoria
descritiva.
Umi
ojejuhúva
apytépe
ojeguereko
oñehesa’ỹijókuri
5
sentencia
ojejuhúva
ko
procedimiento
ryepýpe,
umíva
apytpe
ojejuhu
mbohapy
nomopyendái
hague
hendaitépe
ojehechakuaávo
medición
de
la
pena
pyenda
oñemoneĩva
art.
65
Código
Penal-pe.
Ipahaitépe,
ojehechauka
mokõi
heñói
hague