68

con

la

base

a

la

medición

de

la

pena

establecida

en

el

art.

65

del

CP.

Finalmente,

se

resalta

que

dos

de

ellas

se

dictaron

en

hechos

punibles

califcados

como

violencia

familiar

como

una

referencia

a

una

política

criminal

judicial,

a

pesar

de

ser

considerado

un

crimen

de

acuerdo

a

la

clasifcación

establecido en el art. 13 del CP

establecido en el art. 13 del CP

establecido en el art. 13 del CP

establecido en el art. 13 del CP

establecido en el art. 13 del CP

establecido en el art. 13 del CP

establecido en el art. 13 del CP.

Palabras clave:

Palabras clave:

Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.

Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.

Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.

Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.

Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.

Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.

Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.

Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.

Procedimiento abreviado, sentencia, motivación, medición de la pena, imputado.

Abstract

The

objective

of

this

research

is

to

analyze

the

fnal

sentences

passed

in

an

abbreviated

procedure in terms of the requirement of motivation established by the Paraguayan Code of Criminal

Procedure.

For

this

purpose,

frstly,

it

was

developed

from

the

background,

the

formalities

and

requirements that the parties must comply with, so that the jurisdictional organ prints the formalities

for

the

application

of

the

mentioned

special

procedure,

which

allows

accelerating

the

conclusion

of

a

trial

before

the

same

instance. Therefore,

in

order

to

achieve

this

objective,

a

qualitative

approach

was

chosen,

with

a

non-experimental

documentary

design. As

for

the

data

collection

technique

was

the

documentary

analysis,

consequently,

a

search

and

reading

of

the

literature

on

the

subject

and

fnal judgments of the virtual portal of the Supreme Court of Justice, during the month of December

2022

of

the

courts

of

the

Central

Department,

for

which

sentences

are

imposed

in

this

context,

was

carried

out.

In

terms

of

scope,

it

was

exploratory-descriptive. Among

the

main

fndings

we

have

the

analysis

of

fve

sentences

passed

in

the

framework

of

the

mentioned

procedure,

of

which

three

of

them

lacked

sufcient

motivation

on

the

basis

of

the

measurement

of

the

penalty

established

in Art.

65

of

the

Penal

Code.

Finally,

it

is

highlighted

that

two

of

them

were

dictated

in

punishable

acts

qualifed

as

family

violence

as

a

reference

to

a

judicial

criminal

policy,

despite

being

considered

a

crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.

crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.

crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.

crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.

crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.

crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.

crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.

crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.

crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.

crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.

crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.

crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.

crime according to the classifcation established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.

Key words:

Key words:

Abbreviated procedure, sentence, motivation, penalty measurement, defendant.

Abbreviated procedure, sentence, motivation, penalty measurement, defendant.

Abbreviated procedure, sentence, motivation, penalty measurement, defendant.

Abbreviated procedure, sentence, motivation, penalty measurement, defendant.

Abbreviated procedure, sentence, motivation, penalty measurement, defendant.

Abbreviated procedure, sentence, motivation, penalty measurement, defendant.

Abbreviated procedure, sentence, motivation, penalty measurement, defendant.

Ñemombyky

Ko jeporeka oñeha’ã ohesa’ỹijo umi sentencia definitiva ho’áva procedimiento abreviado-

kuápe

omyesakã

haĝua

umi

mba’e

omopyendáva

ichupe

ojerureháicha

paragupai

Código

Procesal

Penal.

Upevarã,

tenonderãite,

ojeguerojera

iñepyrũmby’ypy,

hekotee

ha

hembijerure

omoañetevaerã

mayma

oñembojovakéva

guive,

ikatu

haĝuáicha

pe

órgano

jurisdiccional

omboguata

pe

procedimiento

especial

jepuru

ryepýpe,

ikatúva

ombohape

juicio

opa

pya’eve

haĝua

upe

instancia-pe.

Upevarã,

oñemoañete

haĝua

ojehupytyséva

oñembosako’i

peteĩ

enfoque

cualitativo,

diseño

documental

no

experimental

hendive.

Pe

Técnica

oipurúva

ombyaty

haĝua

marandúkatu

kuatiañe’ẽ

ñehesa’ỹijo,

upéicha

rupi,

oñembosako’i

peteĩ

jeporeka

ha

oñemoñe’ẽ

opáichagua kuatia ojeguerekóva ko ñe’ẽrã rehe ha umi sentencia definitiva ojejuhúva Corte Suprema

de

Justicia

página-pe,

umi

juzgado

departamento

central

-peguáva

diciembre

2022

pegua

pukukue

javeve,

umi

kuatia

ojehaiha

pegua

condena.

Upe

ijepysokue

katu

héra

exploratoria

descritiva.

Umi

ojejuhúva

apytépe

ojeguereko

oñehesa’ỹijókuri

5

sentencia

ojejuhúva

ko

procedimiento

ryepýpe,

umíva

apytpe

ojejuhu

mbohapy

nomopyendái

hague

hendaitépe

ojehechakuaávo

medición

de

la

pena

pyenda

oñemoneĩva

art.

65

Código

Penal-pe.

Ipahaitépe,

ojehechauka

mokõi

heñói

hague