Perspectives and prospects of the Constitutional Jurisdiction
Keywords:
constitutional review, control judicial, tensión política, igualdad fácticaAbstract
The theory of constitutional control within its origins, foundations, variants and application, occupies a central place in the theoretical and practical in terest of different areas of the exercise of law. The purpose of the work is to reflect and share the different challenges facing the exercise of constitutionality control and the recognition of the constitution as the supreme law. The perspective and prospective of different discussions along the evolution of the exercise of the con trol of constitutionality are addressed: political, judicial, procedural, the difficulty of institutional role of the Supreme Courts or Constitutional Courts, which refers to institutional tension; and the harshest point of the exercise of control, consisting of the analysis of a norm emanating from the reforming Constituent Power, which is described as sovereign tension; therefore, encompass the challenges that have been addressed by doctrine, jurisprudence and the political debate around the exercise of constitutional control, and structural challenges. The body in charge of such control in a democracy that faces a potentially conflicting role must be the guarantor of the Constitution as the supreme rule of the order, defending it from the violations that may be committed by political powers; and also to ensure that they can fulfill the powers of government that the Constitution itself confers.Downloads
References
Amaya , J. A. (2005). Crisis de la función constitucional de la Corte Suprema Argentina. Revista de la Maestría en Derecho Procesal.
Amaya, J. A. (2012). Marbury v. Madison. Sobre el origen del control judicial de constitucionalidad.
Asunción: La Ley .Asociación Peruana de Ciencias Jurìdicas y Conciliación. (2005). El Juez constitucional argentino y su crisis. Revista de Derecho de la Asociación Pe-ruana de Ciencias Jurìdicas y Conciliación, 6 - 29.
Basso, L. (1958). Discorsi e scritti sulla constituzione. Natura e funzioni dell opposizione dell ordinamento constituzionale italiano (pág. 377). Mila-no: Giuffre.
Chemerinsky. (2004). In defense of judicial review: the perilss of popular consti-tutionalism. University of Illionois Law Review.
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación - Argentina. (2010). El control estricto de la legitimación y el debido proceso democratico en el caso Thomas. Su-plemento Jurisprudencial de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación.
Garcia Mansilla. (2008). Harvard Law Review. Estado actual del debate sobre el control judicial de constitucionalidad en los Estados Unidos. Instituto de Politica Constitucional de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias Morales y Polìticas.
Gelli, M. (2009). Los liderazgos de la Corte Suprema en la jurisprudencia del tribunal (2004 - 2009). XIX Encuentro de Profesores de Derecho Consti-tucional.
San Miguel de Tucuman.Sagues , N. (2006). Derecho Procesal Constitucional. Logros y obstáculos. Bue-nos Aires: Ad Hoc.
Sagues, N. (2006). La interpretación judicial de la Constitución. Buenos Aires: Lexis Nexis.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Investigación en Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License
which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and initial publication in Magazine.
- This journal provides open access to its content, based on the principle that providing the public with free access to research supports a greater global exchange of knowledge."
