Motivation of definitive ruling in abbreviated proceedings at the national level
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66744/kgd71f30Keywords:
Abbreviated procedure, sentence, motivation, penalty measurement, defendantAbstract
The objective of this research is to analyze the final sentences passed in an abbreviated procedure in terms of the requirement of motivation established by the Paraguayan Code of Criminal Procedure. For this purpose, firstly, it was developed from the background, the formalities and requirements that the parties must comply with, so that the jurisdictional organ prints the formalities for the application of the mentioned special procedure, which allows accelerating the conclusion of a trial before the same instance. Therefore, in order to achieve this objective, a qualitative approach was chosen, with a non-experimental documentary design. As for the data collection technique was the documentary analysis, consequently, a search and reading of the literature on the subject and final judgments of the virtual portal of the Supreme Court of Justice, during the month of December 2022 of the courts of the Central Department, for which sentences are imposed in this context, was carried out. In terms of scope, it was exploratory-descriptive. Among the main findings we have the analysis of five sentences passed in the framework of the mentioned procedure, of which three of them lacked sufficient motivation on the basis of the measurement of the penalty established in Art. 65 of the Penal Code. Finally, it is highlighted that two of them were dictated in punishable acts qualified as family violence as a reference to a judicial criminal policy, despite being considered a crime according to the classification established in art. 13 of the Penal Code.
Downloads
References
Alexandre Preciado, S., Chamba Aguilar, Y., y Vilela Pincay, W. (2019). Vulneración del derecho al debido proceso en la aplicación del procedimiento abreviado. Opuntia Brava, 11(2), 414.
Baquerizo, J. (2013). El procedimiento Abreviado. Revista Jurídica de la Facultad de Jurispruduencia de la Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil, 13, 594-605.
Bobino, A., y Maier, J. (2001). El procedimiento abreviado. Tortura y plea bargaining. Buenos Aires: El Puerto.
Cantos Ludeña, R., Durán Ocampo, A., y Gutiérrez Campoverde, H. (2019). Vulneración del debido proceso en el procedimiento penal abreviado. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 11(4), 416-417.
Centurion Ortiz, R. F. (2018). Codigo Penal Paraguayo Comentado. Asuncion, Paraguay: Lexijuris.
Centurion, R., y Vazquez Rossi, J. (2014). Codigo Procesal Penal Comentado. Asunción, Paraguay: Intercontinental.
Enríquez Burbano, G. (2017). El procedimiento abreviado como una forma de descongestión del sistema judicial penal. Revista de la Facultad de Jurisprudencia(2), 15.
Enríquez Burbano, G. (2017). El procedimiento abreviado como una forma de descongestión del sistema judicial penal. Revista de la Facultad de Jurisprudencia(2), 1-37.
F.S.A S/ Hurto Agravado Tentativa, 65 (Juzgado Penal n.º 1, 30 de Noviembre de 2022).
Falcone Salas, D. (2005). La absolución en el procedimiento abreviado. Revista de Derecho (Valparaiso), 1(XXVI), 363-378.
Ferrajoli, L. (1995). Derecho y Razón. Teoría del garantismo penal. Madrid: Trotta.
G.A.D.L S/ Violencia Familiar, 106 (Juzgado Penal de Garantías n.º 2, 13 de Diciembre de 2022)
Gonzalez Castillo, J. (2006). La fundamentación de las sentencias y la sana critica. Revista Chilena de Derecho, 33(1), 93-107.
J.C.C. S/ Hurto, 62 (Juzgado Penal de Garantías n.º 2, 02 de Diciembre de 2022).
J.M.M.P.C S/ Hurto Agravado, 89 (Juzgado Penal de Garantías n.º 3, 05 de Diciembre de 2022).
Hernández Sampieri, R., y Mendoza Torres, C. P. (2018). Metodología de la Investigación Científica. México: Edamasa Impresiones, S.A. de C.V.
Maier, J. (2012). Derecho Procesal Penal. Buenos Aires: Del Puerto.
Naime González, A., y Zaragoza Contreras, L. (2019). El principio de igualdad en el Procedimiento Abreviado. Derecho y Cambio social(58), 360-385.
R.D.E.O S/ Violencia Familiar, 124 (Juzgado Penal de Garantias n.º 1, 01 de Diciembre de 2022).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rocío Belén Pérez Zárate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License
which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and initial publication in Magazine.
- This journal provides open access to its content, based on the principle that providing the public with free access to research supports a greater global exchange of knowledge."
