Regime of the action in the punishable act of negligent injury
Abstract
Since the entry into force of Law 3340/08, which modifies some provisions of the Penal Code (CP), several magistrates consider that the modification inserted in article 113 of the CP has modified the regime of the action in relation to the fact punishable by wrongful injury. In this sense, the judges interpret that the aforementioned punishable act went from being a "crime of private criminal action" to a "crime of public criminal action at the request of a party." The basis of this situation is that, according to the opinion of the magistrates, the modification of article 113 of the CP produced the tacit repeal of art. 17 inc. 3 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPP). On the other hand, for the Public Ministry, the modification of art. 113 of the CP does not modify article 17 inc. 3 of the CPP, therefore, there are two contrary criteria. With these antecedents, the present investigation proposes to study the problems raised and for this it will start from the following generic question: did the new wording of article 113 of the CP modify the regime of the action with respect to the punishable act of culpable injury?
Downloads
References
Carl Christoph Stübel, “System des allgemeinen Peinlichen Rechts”, T.II, Sommerschen Buchhandlung, Leipzig, 1795.-•
Karl Binding, “Die Normen und ihre Übertretung, Tomo I”, 2ª Edición. Reimpresión 1965. IV, 1919, 203 y n. 5.-•
José María Rodríguez Devesa y Alfonso Serrano Gómez, Delitos de Lesión y delitos de peligro, en Derecho penal español, Dykinson, Madrid 1994.-•
Prof. Wolfgang Schöne, La Ley 1160/97 - Código Penal de la República del Paraguay. Universidad del Norte – Asunción – Paraguay.•
Prof. Luigi Ferrajoli, Derecho y Razón: Teoría del Garantismo Penal. Edi-torial Trotta. Año 2000.-•
Karolina Víquez, Derecho penal del enemigo ¿Una quimera dogmática o un modelo orientado al futuro? Polit. Crim. Nº 3, 2007, A2, p. 4 [http://www.politicacriminal.cl].•
Miguel Polaino Orts, “Vigencia de la norma: el Potencial de Sentido de un Concepto. El Pensamiento Filosófico y Jurídico-Penal de Günther Jakobs. México D.F. (México). Flores Editor y Distribuidor, S.A. de C.V., México D.F. (México). 2007.-•
Teresa Rodríguez Montañés, “Delitos de Peligro, dolo e imprudencia”. Ru-binzal
–Culzoni, Editores, Buenos Aires. Año 2004.-• Alejandro Aponte C. ¿Derecho Penal de Enemigo o Derecho Penal del Ciu-dadano? Editorial Temis. Bogotá – Colombia. Año 2005.•
Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni, Alejandro Alagia, Alejandro Slokar; “Manual de Derecho Penal. Parte General”. Editorial Ediar. 2ª Edición. Buenos Aires. 2006.-•
Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni, “La palabra de los muertos. Conferencias de Cri-minología Cautelar”, Ed. Ediar, 1ª Edición. Buenos Aires. Año 2011.-•
Eugenio Raúl Zaffaroni, “La Cuestión Criminal”. Editorial Planeta. 3ª Edi-ción. Buenos Aires. Abril de 2012.-•
Germán Aller, “El derecho penal en Peligro”. Editorial Bijupa. Asunción. Año 1998.-
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurìdica Investigaciòn en Ciencias Jurìdicas y Sociales
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License
which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and initial publication in Magazine.
- This journal provides open access to its content, based on the principle that providing the public with free access to research supports a greater global exchange of knowledge."
